Absolutely not. If anything, it just draws attention to it.
I'm not sure I believe in the integrity of these results enough to worry about sullying them in the first place. Though if you wanted to be charitable, you could interpret them as meaning that you mesh well with people of any gembond, rather than taking the result to literally mean that you don't have standards.
Which is literally what it says, but I think we've established that the author is not a wordsmith.
Oh yes. One of the other predominant faiths in my country is that of Shelyn, who is the goddess of love and beauty. Her clergy is full of artists and poets and musicians.
And probably skilled lovers as well, but as none of them are here, I will do my best to fill in.
Applying one's skills across myriad disciplines is very attractive in a man, you know. Do you know any poetry? Tell me something about taxation that would make me blush.
Then I will indulge you a little, for your amusement. Here is a short little rhyme I know:
At draw-gloves we'll play, And prithee let's lay A wager, and let it be this: Who first to the sum Of twenty shall come, Shall have for his winning a kiss.
A lot of poems I've heard back home are quite overwrought, but I do enjoy that one. I didn't bring any written poetry with me, so I'm limited those I can remember in their entirety.
Unless I were to trawl the network for local works. But I think that might be amusing in a rather different way.
I don't know! The kind with some heart in it, I suppose. What is the point if it wanders around a meter and belabors a rhyme and does nothing for the emotions? None!
no subject
The former, obviously! I do not care one whit how inebriated this "quiz maker" was, but their words are quite
[hmm.]
evocative.
no subject
Did you try taking the quiz more than once? I'm a little curious to know if the other results are equally egregious.
Also, perhaps the author wanted to include more than four results, but lacked the wit to add a fifth option that wasn't crude and insulting.
no subject
I believe the $$ are an attempt to circumvent the coarseness. Do you think it's working?
no subject
I'm not sure I believe in the integrity of these results enough to worry about sullying them in the first place. Though if you wanted to be charitable, you could interpret them as meaning that you mesh well with people of any gembond, rather than taking the result to literally mean that you don't have standards.
Which is literally what it says, but I think we've established that the author is not a wordsmith.
no subject
And is that the impression I give? Never mind, allow me to recreate the questions here for you! Be honest.
[He linked the quiz... but whatever, do the Constantin version:]
Question one: What is your favorite color?
1. Green
2. Red
3. Purple
4. Blue
5. Annoying fifth option that serves no purpose
no subject
Also... I enjoy that you listed the fifth option even though you preemptively wrote it off as annoying and pointless.
no subject
I suppose if your favorite is not on my extensive list, you will have to pick the dreadful fifth option.
no subject
For now we can imagine my favourite colour is blue.
But for the record, it's actually gold.
[Why else would all of his jewellery be gold? It's a very pretty metal.]
no subject
Gold is a lovely color.
Question two: Never mind all of that, what kind of date would you like me to take you on?
[Haha, remember the gala... This was not actually the purpose of these texts all along, but he can multitask.]
no subject
I like this line of questioning considerably more.
Is it a poor answer if I say I would like you to choose something that sounds fun to you?
no subject
And yes, that is far too broad!
no subject
[What kind of priest is that, exactly? Unclear.]
I will narrow it down for you: We should do something that doesn't involve food or sitting still for long periods of time.
[He does enough sitting still when he's at his office.]
You could make a short list, perhaps. But for this list you needn't include any annoying extraneous options.
no subject
I'm searching for a quiz that will give me superb date ideas as we speak.
[Is he? Tough to say.]
no subject
And probably skilled lovers as well, but as none of them are here, I will do my best to fill in.
no subject
no subject
I do know some poetry, actually. Alas, none of it is about taxes, but then I am no poet and I didn't write any of it.
no subject
Yes, and? What must I do to get a verse out of you?
no subject
It hardly has the same impact when it's written on a screen.
no subject
If you would like to read me poetry when I see you next, however, I will not say no.
I spent too long looking at poems online because of this thread
At draw-gloves we'll play,
And prithee let's lay
A wager, and let it be this:
Who first to the sum
Of twenty shall come,
Shall have for his winning a kiss.
call that method rping
For my amusement, and how! That one is very sweet. And very subtle!
no subject
Unless I were to trawl the network for local works. But I think that might be amusing in a rather different way.
no subject
no subject
[It would have been before he moved back to the city, so... decades ago, at least.]
Let me ask you a question, since you've already quizzed me. [He didn't, really. Anyway,] What kind of poetry do you enjoy?
no subject
That kind.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)